Abstract 摘要 Inrecentyears，the control valve industry has seen an important debateaboutthe validity of limiting the valve trim exit velocity head toamaximum of 480 kPa in gas and steam applications。Thisvelocitylimitation is assumed to provide an acceptable noise levelandavoid problems that arise in control valve gas andsteamapplications。However，in a very large numberofapplications，adopting a velocity limiting approach may requiretheuse of expensive multi-stage or multi-turn trim designs。Thepurposeof this article is to demonstrate that low noise levels canbeachieved without following this overly conservative andexpensivetrim exit velocity head limitation。Also，this article willshow thathaving a trim exit velocity head lower than 480 kPa willstillgenerate a very high valve noise level if the valve outletMachnumber is high。
近年來(lái)，控制閥行業(yè)出現(xiàn)關(guān)于氣體或蒸汽應(yīng)用中限制*高閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭小于480KPa有效性的爭(zhēng)論。它被假定為可以提供可接受的聲壓級(jí)，避免在氣體或蒸汽應(yīng)用中出現(xiàn)控制閥難題。然而，在大量的應(yīng)用中采用限制速度頭的做???需要采用保守昂貴的多級(jí)或多回路設(shè)計(jì)。這篇文章的目的是要說(shuō)明低聲壓級(jí)可以在不用昂貴的速度頭限制方式下實(shí)現(xiàn)。另外，這篇文章顯示在流體速度頭低于480KPa，但閥門出口流體速度馬赫數(shù)較高的情況下仍會(huì)產(chǎn)生相當(dāng)高的聲壓級(jí)。
Noise Prediciton inControlValves 控制閥噪音預(yù)測(cè)
TheIEC534-8-3 Aerodynamic Noise Standard is the most widely used inthevalve industry for noise prediction in control valves。Thisstandardcalculates the stream power and the acoustical efficiencyfactorsat various flow regimes。IEC 534-8-3 identifies five flowregimesthat are determined by the relationship between variouspressureparameters。This standard also provides methods to calculatetheinternal sound pressure，its corresponding peakfrequency，thetransmission loss，and the A-weighted noise levelat 1 mdownstream of the valve and 1 m away from the pipe wall。It isveryimportant to note that this IEC standard does notrecommendlimiting the trim exit velocity head to 480 kPa，in orderto achievea low noise level in the valve。
IEC534-8-3空氣動(dòng)力學(xué)噪聲標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是控制閥領(lǐng)域使用的*廣的工業(yè)閥門噪聲預(yù)測(cè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。這一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)計(jì)算流體在各個(gè)方向的聲響效率因素，IEC534-8-3定義了由各種壓力參數(shù)確定的五個(gè)方向流體。這一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)還規(guī)定了計(jì)算內(nèi)部聲壓的方法，其相應(yīng)的峰頻率、傳輸損失和在閥門下游1米處及管道側(cè)面1m處的加權(quán)聲壓級(jí)。很重要的一點(diǎn)是IEC標(biāo)準(zhǔn)并沒有建議通過(guò)限制閥門縮流處速度頭為480KPa來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)閥門低聲壓級(jí)。
Valve trim exitvelocityhead 閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭
閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭計(jì)算式為：
KE=1/2＊ρ＊V2 （1）
公式中
KE閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭 Pa
ρ 節(jié)流處流體密度kg/m3
V 縮流處流體速度
聲速C計(jì)算公式為：
C=(γ＊R＊T)1/2 （2）
公式中
C 聲音速度 m/s
γ 氣體比熱
R 氣體常數(shù)R=8314/MW MW是氣體分子量
T 氣體溫度 K
從公式1和2可以解出：
KEregimellthruV= （1/2 ＊ρ＊C2）=1/2＊ρ＊γ＊R＊T （3）
Valve outlet machnumber閥門出口馬赫數(shù)
Averycritical parameter in gas and steam applications is thevalveoutlet Mach number，which is defined as the ratio of thefluidvelocity at the valve outlet，to the sonic velocity in thefluid atthe given temperature。This is a very important parameterindetermining not only the noise level in the valve，but alsothepotential for vibration in the valve/pipe system and potentialforerosion damage to the body if the outlet mach numberishigh。Typically，a control valve body has a close resonancefrequencyto the pipe system。Therefore，a high outlet mach number cangeneratea frequency that will match the valve/pipe systemresonancefrequency and this will lead tovibration。Unfortunately，the trimexit velocity head alone is not agood predictor of such animportant phenomena。For superheated steamand clean gas，a valveoutlet mach number below 0.4 is recommendedfor continuousoperation and below 0.5 for intermittentoperation。Keeping the machnumber low will result in a low noiselevel and will eliminate thepotential for vibration problems in thevalve/pipe system。Themaximum valve outlet velocity should belimited to mach 0.3 forsaturated steam，due to the thermodynamicproperties of the fluid。Avery small decrease in the temperature ofsaturated steam may leadto the formation of liquid droplets withinthe steam and this willbe extremely erosive at highvelocities。
氣體和蒸汽控制應(yīng)用中閥門的出口馬赫數(shù)是一個(gè)非常關(guān)鍵的參數(shù)，其定義為在給定溫度下流體離開閥門出口的時(shí)候的速度是聲速的倍數(shù)。這是一個(gè)很重要的參數(shù)，如果閥門出口流速馬赫數(shù)過(guò)高，不僅造成閥門聲壓級(jí)高，而且容易造成閥門/管道系統(tǒng)振動(dòng)及侵蝕破壞。通常，控制閥閥體的共振頻率和管道系統(tǒng)比較接近。因此，高的閥門出口馬赫數(shù)將能夠產(chǎn)生一個(gè)與管道系統(tǒng)頻率相配合的頻率，這將導(dǎo)致發(fā)生共振?？上?，單靠閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭并不能很好的預(yù)測(cè)這種現(xiàn)象。對(duì)于過(guò)熱蒸汽或干凈的氣體，閥門的出口馬赫數(shù)推薦在連續(xù)操作情況下低于0.4，間歇操作時(shí)候低于0.5。保持低馬赫數(shù)將能夠獲得低聲壓級(jí)，同時(shí)也將會(huì)避免發(fā)生閥門及管道系統(tǒng)振動(dòng)等問(wèn)題。由于流體的熱力學(xué)性質(zhì)，對(duì)于飽和蒸汽*大的閥門出口馬赫數(shù)應(yīng)限制在0.3。很小的飽和蒸汽溫度下降都有可能導(dǎo)致在蒸汽中形成液滴，這種高速液滴將會(huì)導(dǎo)致非常嚴(yán)重的破壞。
Example 舉例
Followingaretwo examples that will illustrate the validity of the argumentsmadeabove。The first example will demonstrate that forsomeapplications，when the time exit velocity head exceeds480kPa，thevalve can still generate a low noise level。The secondexample willshow that for some other applications having a trimexit velocityhead lower than 480kPa but a high mach number，thevalve willgenerate a very high noise level。
以下是兩個(gè)例子可以證明上述觀點(diǎn)是有效的。**個(gè)例子顯示在一些應(yīng)用中，當(dāng)閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭超過(guò)480KPa時(shí)，閥門仍能處于低聲壓級(jí)。**個(gè)例子顯示另外一些應(yīng)用中，閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭低于480KPa，但有高的馬赫數(shù)時(shí)，閥門會(huì)產(chǎn)生很高聲壓級(jí)。
Example 1 例1
Consideranapplication with 30,000 kg/hr of air at 100℃。The valveinletpressure is 30 bar and is outlet pressure is 12 bar。
工況：介質(zhì)空氣；流量30,000kg/h；溫度100℃；閥前壓力 30 bar；閥后壓力 12 bar
AccordingtoIEC 534-3-8，this application is represented by flow regimeIV。Nowconsider a 4" globe style valve with single-stage drilledholecage。For the service conditions given above，the noiselevelgenerated by the 4" valve is approximately 85 dBA with an 8"outletpipe schedule 40。The trim exit velocity is sonic and it isequal to337 m/s from Equation 2。The air density at the trim outletis11.17kg/m3。From Equation 3， the trim exit velocityheadis equal to 836 kPa。 The valve outlet mach number isapproximately0.24。
根據(jù)IEC534-3-8這屬于第四類。現(xiàn)在考慮選擇一臺(tái)4"的單級(jí)籠式套筒閥。根據(jù)前面的工況條件計(jì)算，這個(gè)4"的閥門的聲壓級(jí)約為85分貝，閥門出口接8"的管道。由方程2可以計(jì)算得節(jié)流速度是音速，等于337米/秒。在閥門出口處的空氣密度是11.17kg/m3。根據(jù)方程3，閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭等于836KPa，閥門的出口馬赫數(shù)約為0.24。
Thus，theexample above demonstrates that a 4" valve with a singlestagedrilled hole cage can achieve a low noise level despite thefactthat the time exit velocity head is much great than the 480kPalimitations that some valve manufacturers advocate。Thevalvesolution described above is technically excellent andveryeconomical compared to a 4" valve with a torturousmultistagetrim。
因此，上例顯示了4"的單級(jí)籠式套筒閥可以實(shí)現(xiàn)低噪音，盡管閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)480KPa。這就是一些廠家主張的這個(gè)方法的局限性。這個(gè)閥門非常出色、經(jīng)濟(jì)的解決了上述問(wèn)題，省去了采用多級(jí)式閥。
Example 2 例2
Consideranapplication with 50,000 kg/hr of air at 100℃。The valveinletpressure is 50 bar and its outlet pressure is 3 bar。
工況：介質(zhì)空氣；流量50,000kg/h；溫度100℃；閥前壓力50bar；閥后壓力3bar
From these service conditions therequiredCv=62。Thus，consider a 6" globe style valve with atorturouspath，with 24 stages，rated Cv = 70。The outlet pipe is 8"schedule40。For the given service conditions，the last turn in thetrim hasan exit velocity of 233 m/s and the fluid outlet density is2.8kg/m3。Thus，per equation 1， the trim exit velocityheadis 76 kPa， well below the maximum limitation of 480kPa。However，despite this very low trim exit velocity head， thevalve noiselevel is 98 dBA because the valve outlet mach numberis0.78。Now，take the same exact trim and install it in an 8"globestyle valve。In this case the valve outlet mach number is 0.4andthe valve noise level is approximately 85 dBA。
從條件計(jì)算得Cv=62。因此，考慮使用一個(gè)6"、具有24級(jí)流路的多級(jí)式球型閥，Cv=70。閥門出口管道為8"。根據(jù)以上條件，閥門的*后出口速度為233m/s，出口處的流體密度為2.8kg/m3。因此，根據(jù)方程1，閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭為76KPa，處于*大限制數(shù)480KPa下。然而，盡管閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭非常的低，但閥門的聲壓級(jí)卻是98分貝，顯然這是由于閥門的出口馬赫數(shù)為0.78造成的?，F(xiàn)在，采用同樣的閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭和8"球型閥。在這種情況下，閥門的出口馬赫數(shù)為0。4，閥門的聲壓級(jí)約85分貝。
Thisexampledemonstrates that a low trim exit velocity head does notresult ina low noise level in the valve，unless the valve outletmach numberis low。It is also noteworthy to mention that for thesameapplication，an 8" globe style valve with two drilled holedcages isan excellent solution for the application above since itwillgenerate a noise level of 80 dBA。These two drilled holed cagesaremuch less expensive than the 24-turn torturous path time。
這個(gè)例子顯示，低閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭不會(huì)保證閥門處于低聲壓級(jí)，除非閥門出口馬赫數(shù)很低。值得一提的是，在這個(gè)例子中一臺(tái)8"、具有雙層閥籠的球型套筒閥也是一個(gè)很好的解決方案，因?yàn)樗a(chǎn)生的噪音水平為80分貝。雙層套筒相對(duì)于24級(jí)流路簡(jiǎn)單了很多。
Conclusion 結(jié)論
Limitingthetrim exit velocity head to a maximum of 480 kPa is not practicalina large number of steam and gas applications。Asdemonstratedabove，this approach can be overly conservative in manygasapplications and it can be insufficient to ensure low valvenoiselevel in others。Low noise level can be achieved with trim thathasan exit velocity head higher than 480 kPa。On the other hand，avalvetrim exit velocity head lower than 480 kPa will have a veryhighnoise level if the valve outlet mach number is notlow。Whenproviding a control valve solution for gas applications，itis veryimportant not to be bound by the trim exit velocityheadlimitation，but rather profile the valve that gives：lownoiselevels， a low outlet mach number and is the mosteconomicalsolution available。
在大量的氣體和水蒸氣應(yīng)用中。限制閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭*高為480KPa是不實(shí)用的，以上證明，這種方法過(guò)于保守，不足以確保閥門的聲壓級(jí)能處于較低水平。在閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭高于480KPa的情況下，低的閥門聲壓級(jí)仍能實(shí)現(xiàn)。另一方面，當(dāng)閥門的閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭低于480KPa時(shí)，如果閥門的出口馬赫數(shù)不處于較低的水平，閥門仍會(huì)有較高的聲壓級(jí)。當(dāng)提供一個(gè)控制閥解決氣體應(yīng)用的時(shí)候，不受閥門內(nèi)件節(jié)流出口速度頭限制是很重要的，概括起來(lái)講就是：使用低的閥門出口馬赫數(shù)來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)閥門低聲壓級(jí)是*經(jīng)濟(jì)、可行的方式。
寫于2004年2月